Connect with us

Latest news

Australia report reveals “shocking; decline in environment

Odyssey News

Published

on

Australia report reveals "shocking; decline in environment
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The long-awaited 2021 State of the Environment Report finds severe deterioration across biodiversity, habitat loss, and pollution.

Canberra, Australia – The state of Australia’s environment is “poor and deteriorating”, a new government report has found.

The 2021 State of the Environment Report, a mandatory assessment conducted every five years, was released on Tuesday by the recently-elected federal Labor government. It had been received by the previous Liberal-National coalition government in December 2021 but not published.

The report is undeniably grim, with the new Minister for the Environment, Tanya Plibersek, describing the findings as “shocking” and “a story of crisis and decline”.

The report found that Australia has lost more mammal species than any other continent in the world. More than 100 Australian species have been declared extinct or extinct in the wild, including eight species of wallaby alone.

One primary cause is habitat destruction.

Almost half the country is now used for grazing sheep and cattle, and about 6.1 million hectares (15 million acres) of primary forest have been cleared since 1990. These changes mean Australia has experienced the third-largest cumulative loss of organic carbon in soil, behind only China and the United States.

Many of the worst changes have occurred in the past five years, with 202 animal and plant species having been declared ‘threatened’ over this period, bringing the total to 377 species becoming threatened in the last decade alone. There are now also more introduced foreign plant species in Australia than native species.

Campaigners, one dressed as a turtle and some in red robes, demand action on climate change as the government releases the State of the Environment report
The State of the Environment report, published every five years, was described as ‘shocking’ by Minister Tania Plibersek [William West/AFP]

Even species supported through focused assistance showed little improvement, and the situation is expected to worsen once the effect of the 2019-20 ‘Black Summer’ bushfires becomes better understood. The bushfires are believed to have killed or displaced as many as three billion animals.

In the water, the news is also dire.

Ocean acidification is reaching a tipping point, threatening the existence of juvenile coral, with the Great Barrier Reef experiencing mass bleaching events in 2016, 2017, 2020 and this year. Sea level rise is affecting many low-lying coastal areas, including the important Kakadu wetlands in the Northern Territory. In the Murray-Darling Basin, one of Australia’s most important river basins, record low water levels were recorded in 2019.

The report, which for the first time includes an Indigenous lead writer – Terri Janke – also pays specific attention to Indigenous heritage and knowledge.

It found that Indigenous heritage continues to be destroyed, such as Juukan Gorge, parts of which were blown up in 2020 by mining giant Rio Tinto to extract iron ore. This ongoing destruction is despite the clear wishes of traditional owners.

‘Extremes more often’

Survey after survey has shown that the Australian public wants more action on climate change.

For many voters, climate change was the number one issue in May’s federal election.

A record number of Greens candidates were elected to the House of Representatives and the Senate, while the Liberal party was all but wiped out in urban strongholds by the ‘teal’ independents who campaigned strongly on climate change. Labor was therefore the only major party able to form a government.

The increase in public support for climate action, and for politicians willing to take that action, is believed to be a direct response to the extreme bushfires, floods, and storms that wide swathes of the country have experienced in recent years.

“Australia has always been a land of extreme weather and climate variability,” notes Andrew King, a senior lecturer in climate science at the University of Melbourne. “[But] human-caused climate change is causing extremes to occur more often and with more devastating impacts.

“This report should act as a wake-up call to the damage we are doing to the world around us. We must decarbonise our economy and society as rapidly as possible to try and limit the environmental losses that we will experience as we keep warming the world.”

A wallaby rests its paws on the arm of a keeper at Taronga Zoo in Sydney where it was taken after the bushfires.
The report found that Australia has lost more mammal species than any other continent in the world, with more than eight species of wallaby – an animal unique to Australia – disappearing [File: Bianca de Marchi/EPA]

Who is to blame?

The State of the Environment report was delivered to the previous Coalition government in December 2021, but they declined to release it ahead of the election.

The new federal Labor government is therefore keen to lay the blame at the feet of the Coalition, which had been in government since 2013. Two of that period’s three prime ministers were outright climate deniers – Tony Abbott and Scott Morrison – while the other, Malcolm Turnbull, was removed by the party because he wanted to do more on climate change.

“Sussan Ley [environment minister under the Coalition] chose to keep it hidden, locked away until after the election … When you read it, you’ll know why. But Australians deserve the truth,” Plibersek told the National Press Club following the launch.

The reality is not quite so black and white.

It is true that the federal Coalition did little to improve the environment, and in several circumstances actively made the situation worse. The Coalition was committed to increased investment in coal and gas, and its plan to cut carbon emissions was largely reliant on potential future technological development.

What federal Labor wants to avoid admitting is that state and territory governments are also culpable for the declining state of the country’s environment. In fact, sub-national governments in Australia have primary responsibility for environmental regulation, and the role of the federal government is limited.

Of the country’s eight states and territories, Labor is in power in six, including in the mining powerhouse states of Queensland and Western Australia. In Queensland alone, Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk has approved at least 18 new coal mines since being elected in 2015. This includes a 1 billion Australian dollar ($680m) coal mine at Olive Downs, where construction began in April.

Euan Ritchie, professor of wildlife ecology and conservation at Deakin University, describes government efforts to protect the environment as an “utter failure”.

“Bushfires devastating wildlife populations, extensive, repeated coral bleaching events, ecosystems collapsing across the continent,” Ritchie lists. “These events are all symptomatic of governments and society not acting on the science and evidence.”

Under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Labor aims to achieve net zero by 2050. It has a 43 percent emissions reduction target by 2030, but this is significantly below the expert-recommended target of 50 to 75 percent. Although promising to invest heavily in renewables, Labor has repeatedly stated it will continue to support the extraction and use of fossil fuels.

Scientists are keen to point out that despite the report’s grim findings, there is still much the country – government and people – can do.

“Every Australian has an opportunity to be on the conservation frontline: saving species in the places they live and work,” said Kylie Soanes, an urban ecologist from the University of Melbourne. She says that research has revealed a huge appetite for nature conservation in cities, but that “actions occur in isolated pockets and need more support”.

Protesters hold placards pointing to the beauty of the Great Barrier Reef and how climate change could destroy it.
Climate change has contributed to a series of bleaching events at the Great Barrier Reef, the world’s largest coral reef system [File: Jono Searle/EPA]

Soanes says we need “a culture shift to support cities as spaces for nature as well as people. If we want people to better support biodiversity, to really get involved in environmental issues, we need to make nature part of every Australian’s everyday experience – something they can see, enjoy, and help save.”

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.
Continue Reading

Latest news

All American’s Tamika Pratt: Unraveling the Mystery

Odyssey

Published

on

By

Tamika-Pratt
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Tamika Pratt The Made-Up Story about Bad Police Work

Tamika Pratt As we dive into the world of “All American,” it’s essential to understand that Tamika Pratt is a fictional character. Her story is a creation of the show’s writers, designed to tackle critical issues like police brutality. Tamika’s character serves as a lens through which the series explores the complex dynamics between law enforcement and the community.

The Real Story of Tamika

Tamika Pratt

Tamika Pratt is not a real person; instead, she’s a product of storytelling.

However, her character symbolizes the real struggles and injustices faced by many in the United States. By delving into her character’s journey, “All American” attempts to reflect the reality of police misconduct and its impact on individuals and communities.

Tamika Pratt is not a real person; she’s a product of storytelling. However, her character symbolizes the real struggles and injustices faced by many in the United States. By delving into her character’s journey, “All American” attempts to reflect the reality of police misconduct and its impact on individuals and communities.

Who Is Tamika Pratt in All American?

Within the framework of the show, Tamika Pratt is depicted as a victim of police brutality.

Her character stands as a powerful representation of those who have suffered injustice at the hands of law enforcement. As a viewer, you might be wondering about the inspiration behind her character and the message the creators aim to convey.

Who Killed Tamika?

In the “All American” series, Tamika Pratt’s character is a symbol, not a real person. Therefore, there is no real incident of her death. The show uses her story to explore themes of social justice and the consequences of police misconduct, highlighting the need for reform in the criminal justice system.

Justice for Tamika” in All American

The quest for justice for Tamika Pratt is a central theme in “All American.” Furthermore, it mirrors real-life movements for justice in cases of police brutality. The show’s portrayal of this struggle raises awareness about the need for accountability and change in law enforcement.” It mirrors real-life movements for justice in cases of police brutality. The show’s portrayal of this struggle raises awareness about the need for accountability and change in law enforcement.

Is there a real Tamika Pratt?

No, there is no real Tamika Pratt. She exists solely within the world of “All American” as a fictional character created to address pressing societal issues.

Who plays Ash’s mom in all American Tamika Pratt ?

Ash’s mom, Tamika Pratt, is portrayed by the talented actress Danielle Campbell.

Where was Tamika Huston body found?

Tamika Pratt

Tamika Pratt’s character does not involve a real-life location or incident, so there is no specific place where her body was found.

What is finding Tamika about?

“Finding Tamika” is not a real documentary or series. However, it may be used in the context of discussions about social justice issues and the need to address police brutality.

What happened to Tamika Wilson?

Tamika Wilson is not a character in “All American.” The focus here is on Tamika Pratt, a character created to address police brutality.

Who is Jordan Baker based on Tamika Pratt?

Jordan Baker is another character in “All American” and is not directly related to Tamika Pratt. He is a character developed to explore different aspects of the high school football drama and related social issues.

Where can I listen to finding Tamika?

“Finding Tamika” may not be a real podcast or documentary, but you can explore various documentaries and podcasts that discuss real-life cases of police brutality and social justice issues.

Where can I watch finding Tamika?

As “Finding Tamika” is not a real series, you won’t find it available for viewing. Instead, consider watching documentaries and shows that focus on real stories of social injustice and police brutality.

Who Is Tamika Pratt In All American? The Fictional Tale Focusing On Police Brutality

Tamika Pratt

Tamika Pratt in “All American” is a compelling character who serves as a symbol of the broader issues surrounding police brutality and social justice. While she may not be a real person, her story is a poignant reminder of the need for change and reform in society. As you delve into the world of “All American,” remember that Tamika Pratt’s character is a fictional narrative designed to spark discussions about the real-world challenges we face.

FAQs

Q1:Is there a real Tamika Pratt?

No, Tamika  is a fictional character in the TV series “All American” created to address issues related to police brutality and social justice.

Q2:Who plays Ash’s mom in All American?

Danielle Campbell portrays the character of Tamika, who is Ash’s mom in “All American.”

Q3:Where was Tamika Huston’s body found?

Tamika Pratt is a fictional character, so there is no real incident involving her body or its location.

Q4:What is “Finding Tamika” about?

“Finding Tamika” is not a real documentary or series. It is a phrase often used in discussions related to police brutality and social justice.

Q5:What happened to Tamika Wilson?

Tamika Wilson is not a character in “All American.” The focus of this series is on Tamika  a fictional character representing police brutality issues.

Conclusion

In a world where social justice and police brutality remain critical topics of discussion, “All American” and the character of Tamika Pratt stand as a testament to the power of storytelling in driving societal change. Remember, the impact of her story is not limited to the small screen but extends to the broader conversation about justice and reform in our society.

ALSO VISIT: Wordle Hint: Unleash Your Inner Word Wizard!

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.
Continue Reading

Latest news

Unraveling the Mystery: The Curious Case of 52 Weeks in a Year Despite 4 Weeks per Month

Ody Team

Published

on

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Introduction

Time, an intangible force that governs our lives, is divided into various units to bring structure to our existence.The interplay of leap years, irregular month lengths, and the 4-week-month cycle harmoniously crafts the curious phenomenon of 52 weeks in a year, answering the question of how many weeks in a year.

Among these units, weeks and months stand as fundamental components, each offering its own rhythm and cadence. A perplexing puzzle arises when we consider the relationship between weeks and months: why does a year, which comprises 12 months, have 52 weeks and not 48 weeks, given that there are typically 4 weeks per month? In this exploration, we embark on a journey to demystify this conundrum, examining the intricate interplay of calendars, leap years, and the fascinating history that shapes the way we measure time.

The Dance of Weeks and Months: A Seeming Paradox

At first glance, the arithmetic seems straightforward: with four weeks per month, shouldn’t a year consist of 48 weeks? However, this simple calculation belies the complexity of calendar systems and the irregularities that emerge when trying to fit neatly divisible units of time.

The Gregorian Calendar: A Key Player

Navigating the intricate dance of leap years and month irregularities provides the intriguing answer to the query: how many weeks in a year? To comprehend this enigma, we must turn our attention to the Gregorian calendar—the most widely used calendar system in the world today. In the Gregorian calendar, a standard year is composed of 365 days, divided into 12 months. This division creates a challenge when reconciling months and weeks due to the uneven number of days in a month.

Leap Years: An Essential Adjustment

The fusion of leap years, varying month lengths, and the steadfast 4-week cycle yields the definitive response to the oft-asked question: how many weeks in a year?The addition of leap years is the crux of the matter. A leap year, occurring every four years, serves as a corrective mechanism to account for the discrepancy between the calendar year and the actual time it takes for Earth to complete its orbit around the sun. Leap years add an extra day, February 29th, to the calendar. This adjustment ensures that the calendar remains synchronized with the astronomical year.

Interestingly, the introduction of leap years influences the distribution of weeks in a year. Since leap years have 366 days—52 weeks and 2 days—the balance between the 4-week-month cycle and the leap year adjustment creates the familiar pattern of 52 weeks in a year.

Weeks and Months: A Harmonious Imbalance

To dissect this phenomenon, let’s delve into the interaction between weeks and months within a leap year and a non-leap year.

  1. Non-Leap Year (365 days): In a non-leap year, 365 days are divided into 12 months, each averaging 30.44 days. While most months have 30 or 31 days, February has 28 days. This irregularity affects the consistency of the 4-week-month cycle.
  2. Leap Year (366 days): In a leap year, the additional day accommodates the 4-week-month cycle. Months in a leap year have 30 or 31 days, but February has 29 days. This extra day contributes to the harmonious alignment of 52 weeks within the year.

Cultural and Historical Influences

In unraveling the curious interaction between leap years, irregular months, and the consistent 4-week cycle, we uncover the precise solution to the timeless query of how many weeks in a year.The origin of the 7-day week, widely adopted today, has cultural and historical roots that span across civilizations. The ancient Babylonians, Egyptians, and Romans all contributed to the development of this temporal framework. Over time, religious and societal practices solidified the 7-day week’s prevalence.

In the context of months, the lunar calendar used by many ancient cultures contributed to the variation in month lengths. Lunar months, determined by the moon’s phases, resulted in months of varying durations. When the Roman calendar was reformed to align with the solar year, the challenge of reconciling lunar and solar cycles further contributed to the irregular month lengths.

Calculating Weeks in a Year: A Precarious Balance

By skillfully accommodating leap years and the ebb and flow of month lengths, we arrive at the calculated answer to the frequently pondered question: how many weeks in a year?The calculation of weeks in a year is a delicate equilibrium between the 4-week-month cycle and the need to synchronize the calendar with astronomical realities. The introduction of leap years, while seemingly unrelated to weeks, plays a pivotal role in creating the consistent pattern of 52 weeks within a year.

Cultural Significance and Implications

Amidst the intricate interplay of calendar mechanics, leap years, and month irregularities, we find the definitive solution to the intriguing question: how many weeks in a year? The 52-week pattern, despite the irregularities of months, has become ingrained in our daily lives. It influences the way we plan schedules, allocate workdays, and celebrate annual events. The harmonious blend of weeks and months provides a sense of balance, even as we navigate the complexities of time.

Conclusion

Within the tapestry of calendar complexities, the synchronization of leap years, month lengths, and the steadfast 4-week cycle seamlessly unveils the precise answer to the perennial question: how many weeks in a year? The perplexing relationship between 52 weeks in a year and the 4-week-month cycle is a testament to the intricacies of calendar systems, leap years, and the historical evolution of how we measure time. This enigma reveals the delicate balance achieved through the interplay of irregular month lengths and the correction introduced by leap years. As we ponder this curious case, we gain a deeper appreciation for the remarkable precision and artistry inherent in the human endeavor to tame the boundless flow of time.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.
Continue Reading

Trending

error: Content is protected !!