Medusa was one of the scariest creatures that Greek mythology created. Her name in Ancient Greek means “guardian, protectress”. She was a monster, a Gorgon, generally described as a winged human female with living venomous snakes in place of hair. Her superpower was simple – gazers upon her face would turn to stone.
It’s hard to tell anything about this Medusa painting other than what you see. So maybe it’s a good time to say what Sigmund Freud in his Das Medusenhaupt (Medusa’s Head) thought of her. In Freud’s interpretation:
To decapitate = to castrate. The terror of Medusa is thus a terror of castration that is linked to the sight of something. Numerous analyses have made us familiar with the occasion for this: it occurs when a boy, who has hitherto been unwilling to believe the threat of castration, catches sight of the female genitals, probably those of an adult, surrounded by hair, and essentially those of his mother.
Sigmund Freud, Das Medusenhaupt (Medusa’s Head).
In this perspective, the “ravishingly beautiful” Medusa is the mother remembered in innocence; before the mythic truth of castration dawns on the subject. Classic Medusa, in contrast, is an Oedipal or libidinous symptom. Looking at the forbidden mother stiffens the subject in illicit desire and freezes him in terror of the Father’s retribution. I know, it’s complicated.
You Can Also READ: medusa artworks
5. Medusa
In 1782, Leonardo da Vinci’s biographer Luigi Lanzi discovered a depiction of Medusa’s head which he erroneously attributed to Leonardo, based on a description of Leonardo’s painting done by Giorgio Vasari. In the 20th century, Bernard Berenson and other leading critics argued against Leonardo’s authorship of the Uffizi painting. It is now believed to be a work of an anonymous Flemish painter, active ca. 1600.
You Can Also READ: medusa artworks